PCMag Digital Network
Seen a hot gadget?  Tell Us   
Contact Us  
Sites We Like
Gearlog on Twitter
Gearlog for Kindle
GoodCleanTech Recycling Superguide
Categories:  
psystar.JPG

A California district judge on Tuesday dismissed a counterclaim filed by Psystar that accused Apple of violating federal and state antitrust laws.

Psystar argued that Apple's operating system is an independent market with no competitors, but the judge disagreed.

"Psystar has cited no decision lending support to its single-brand product market theory," Judge William Alsup wrote in his decision. Psystar's own claim explains that the Mac OS performs the same functions as other operating systems, he said.

Apple sued Psystar in July for copyright infringement, breach of contract, trademark and trade infringement, and unfair competition after Psystar started selling the Open Computer, which uses a modified version of Apple's OS X.

Psystar filed a counterclaim in August, arguing that a market could exist for third-party Mac clones, if not for the legal and technical barriers that Apple has set up.

Psystar argued that demand would not be affected if Apple increased prices for its OS and said that similarly configured computers cost much less than Apple machines.

"Although the responsiveness of one product to the price of another is at the heart of the market definition analysis, a mere price differential alone does not necessarily signal a distinct market [or] mean that a product is unconstrained by competition," Judge Alsup concluded.

Psystar also cited Apple's ubiquitous advertising campaign as evidence of its market dominance, but the judge concluded just the opposite.

"Those advertising campaigns more plausibly support an inference contrary to that asserted in the counterclaim--vigorous advertising is a sign of competition, not a lack thereof," according to the ruling. "If Mac OS simply had no reasonable substitute, Apple's vigorous advertising would be wasted money."

Last month, Apple and Psystar agreed to enter into a dispute resolution process in an effort to resolve Apple's suit against Psystar. According to court documents, they have until January 31 to negotiate a settlement. If no such agreement is reached, a jury trial is set to begin on November 9, 2009.

Mixx It Mixx It Digg It Digg It StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble Share More...

Content Recommendations from Evri
Posted by: ryan
November 19, 2008 5:23 PM

As surprising this can be...
although I am a supporter for Apple but I do agree this is total monopoly... if Microsoft can be sued, then so can be Apple. I think the judge had an iPhone.

http://www.livbit.com


* = required
    Remember Me?
  
Please keep your comments on topic. Intelligent, thoughtful comments and questions are appreciated. Comments that contain personal attacks or profanity may be edited or removed. Comments containing personal information such as phone numbers, credit card numbers, or addresses may be edited or removed. Comments with advertisements will be removed.


 
Info Centers
Special Offers
         
 
  Ziff Davis Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Newsletters | RSS Feeds | Ziff Davis Media International
Digital Edition Customer Service | Subscribe to PCMag Digital Edition | Reprints
AppScout | Cranky Geeks | DigitalLife | DL.TV | ExtremeTech | GearLog | GoodCleanTech | PC Magazine | PCMagCasts | Security Watch | Smart Device Central | TechSaver
AppScout Mobile | Gearlog Mobile | GoodCleanTech Mobile | PCMag.com Mobile
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Linking Policy | Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2009 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. PC Magazine, the PCMag.com logo and Gearlog are registered trademarks of Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Media Inc. is prohibited.