PCMag Digital Network
Seen a hot gadget?  Tell Us   
Contact Us  
Sites We Like
Gearlog on Twitter
Gearlog for Kindle
GoodCleanTech Recycling Superguide
Categories:  

6CTIO_4-meter.jpg

Is it just me or does it seem easier than ever to be an astronomer? There was a time, if you wanted to use a telescope like the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile (pictured above) you'd have to travel to Chile and brave the elements to get to its mountaintop perch. Opening the roof to let the telescope poke through also let the cold come in (current weather conditions here). Heat? Please! You don't want to distort the path of the photons heading into the lens.

The days of photographic plates are gone. Now astronomers can view from afar--in fact they can live regular daytime hours like the rest of us if they want! Unfortunately, as life gets better, technology is making the astronomer less important in deciding where the telescope will gaze.

"On the night of February 6, 2006, Los Alamos astrophysicist Przemek Wozniak was awakened by a cell-phone call from RAPTOR, the small robotic optical telescope array on Fenton Hill, about 30 miles from Los Alamos in northern New Mexico's Jemez Mountains. RAPTOR had found something strange--a rapidly rising light signal coming from the position of a very short gamma-ray burst detected and located. These bursts announce the birth of stellar-size black holes and are the most powerful events since the Big Bang." - Los Alamos National Lab release


NASA finds the gamma-ray bursts with the help of a satellite, but the bursts only last a few minutes. Developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory the ROTSE-I (Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment-I) telescope had been able to hone in on a burst in ten seconds, faster than mere mortals can react... if they would have reacted at all. People have a tendency to discount things that are anomalous or happen infrequently. And since ROTSE-I's replacement RAPTOR has cut the time to eight seconds there's even less time for error, or thought.

"If humans had been in the loop they would have said, as we did, 'Gamma-ray bursts don't act like that. Forget it. And RAPTOR wouldn't have found anything." - Tom Vestrand, Space and Atmospheric Sciences

We're not done yet. RAPTOR will soon be replaced by RAPTOR-K with better optics and more processing power. It won't be necessary to wait for a satellite signal to search for gamma-ray bursts. RAPTOP-K will just keep an eye-on-the-sky bringing in tens of thousands of images a night, or about a terrabyte of data per week--analyzing it almost instantaneously. But what will make this a game changer is its ability to scan, compare it with a database and mine for ongoing gamma-bursts autonomously without the need for human help. It is astronomy without the astronomer!

Mixx It Mixx It Digg It Digg It StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble Share More...

Content Recommendations from Evri
Posted by: Mr Squid
November 12, 2008 10:22 AM

It is not true that astronomers are less important in deciding where a telescope will point. Telescopic observations are still determined by astronomers, just as they were in the old days of riding in the cage. What has changed is that astronomers now set up queues of targets and rules for selecting targets in real time. In the past an astronomer went to a telescope with a list of sources to look at, and manually pointed the telescope. Today an astronomer gives that list to a technician who programs the telescope to look automatically. Telescopes like ROTSE are programmed to change their targets in real time based on automated alerts from satellites, but it is still astronomers who set up the rules for this and decide what types of alerts will be accepted. Telescopes today are far more productive than they used to be, partly because astronomers today can specify far more complex observing programmes than they used to be able to. I still miss spending nights observing though.


Posted by: Geoff Fox
November 12, 2008 1:06 PM

Maybe we're splitting hairs here, but Los Alamos Lab's official release says: "The speed of the system will continue to set records, but the truly revolutionary aspect is the introduction of "thinking" software agents that can carry on two-way conversations between the central decision-making computer--all with no human intervention."


* = required
    Remember Me?
  
Please keep your comments on topic. Intelligent, thoughtful comments and questions are appreciated. Comments that contain personal attacks or profanity may be edited or removed. Comments containing personal information such as phone numbers, credit card numbers, or addresses may be edited or removed. Comments with advertisements will be removed.


 
Info Centers
Special Offers
         
 
  Ziff Davis Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Newsletters | RSS Feeds | Ziff Davis Media International
Digital Edition Customer Service | Subscribe to PCMag Digital Edition | Reprints
AppScout | Cranky Geeks | DigitalLife | DL.TV | ExtremeTech | GearLog | GoodCleanTech | PC Magazine | PCMagCasts | Security Watch | Smart Device Central | TechSaver
AppScout Mobile | Gearlog Mobile | GoodCleanTech Mobile | PCMag.com Mobile
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Linking Policy | Contact Us
Copyright © 1996-2009 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. PC Magazine, the PCMag.com logo and Gearlog are registered trademarks of Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Media Inc. is prohibited.