A new Microsoft-developed technology called SideSight looks like something that deserves to be on a next-generation iPod touch. Or in a magician's repertoire.
The SideSight technology is contained in yet another paper that company executives are presenting at the User Interface Software and Technology conference this week. (See Microsoft's take on new ways that cell phones could "talk" as well as guided tours of images.), The paper in question is titled "SideSight: Multi-"touch" Interaction Around Small Devices," and is authored by Alex Butler, Shahram Izadi, and Steve Hodges, all with Microsoft Research UK.
Touch was a revolutionary concept when it debuted with the iPhone, in part because it was implemented so well with gestures. Pinching, sliding and tapping the iPhone and iPod touch all directly impact the interface.
SideSight removes "touch" from the device and makes it a function of the paper, tabletop, or even the air that's next to the device. What does this mean? According to Microsoft, it opens up the possibility for "touch" functions to be built into tiny devices that don't actually need a touchscreen.
"Despite the flexibility of touchscreens, using such an input mode carries a number of tradeoffs," the paper's authors wrote. "For many mobile devices, e.g. wristwatches and music players, a touchscreen can be impractical because there simply isn't enough screen real estate. With a continued trend for ever-smaller devices, this problem is being exacerbated. Even when a touch-screen is practical, interacting fingers will occlude parts of the display, covering up valuable screen pixels and making it harder to see the results of an interface action."
So what can you actually do with SideSight? Quite a bit, as it turns out. By twisting one's hands appropriately on either side of the phone, objects could be rotated in place. Pages could be panned and scrolled by moving a hand up and down, and Microsoft also proved that text could be entered and edited on the main screen through a stylus while the other hand scrolled the page -- a movement that would be akin to the motions a user's hands would make if he or she were writing on a sheet of paper.
A quick motion toward the device could also be interpreted as a "click," according to Microsoft.
The key is a row of tiny optical sensors that look "outside" the device. In a prototype Microsoft built for the paper, the researchers took a HTC Touch mobile phone, and augmented it with two linear arrays of discrete infrared (IR) proximity sensors, specifically ten Avago HSDL-9100-021 940nm IR proximity sensors spaced 10 millimeters apart. Although only the sides of the phone were enhanced, the entire periphery of a device could include these sensors, the researchers said. The sensors can read inputs up to 10 centimeters away, just through reflected infrared light.
"We were pleasantly surprised by the performance of the SideSight sensors in the typical office environments we tried given that we took no special precautions to reject ambient light," the paper's authors wrote. "We attribute this in part to the fact that the sensors are looking horizontally rather than vertically upwards towards overhead lighting."
Individual fingers are sensed as a "blob" by the sensor array. One problem: users tend to drift one or more fingers into the area covered by the sensor field, the authors noted. Because they were unable to consistent determine which fingers were actively controlling the device and which were simply incidental, Microsoft decided to only look for a single finger, and use that to control the phone.
(The authors noted as well that the sensors weren't directly connected to the phone. Instead, they were connected via USB to a PC, and then to the phone via Bluetooth. The convoluted interface reduced the effective sensing capability to 11 frames per second, a limitation of the test rig and not the circuits.)
What does the future of SideSight look like? Improved power consumption, improved sensor range, and an enhanced prototype: "In the future we believe that it may be possible to print or-ganic electronic versions of such sensors, and so we are also interested in exploring a SideSight configuration that has the entire casing covered in this type of proximity sensing material," the Microsoft Research employees wrote.
October 22, 2008 3:39 AM
Why've microsoft do this?
How've to work on table of oil if is close to crumbs of pandorro?
October 22, 2008 3:50 AM
This looks very cool. Sort of futuristic. This wouldn't be useful just yet though, I wouldn't of thought so anyway.
October 22, 2008 6:19 AM
MS presents... the mouse
and again dumb (IBM) and dumber (the other guy in the comments) spoke their (dumb) minds...
PS: why go to the moon? It's empty... dumb a...s
October 22, 2008 8:34 AM
nice idea, id bet apple will be the first to implement it though, then patent it in one way or another, surprises me MS has alot of new developments this past few years. good for them
October 22, 2008 12:02 PM
If Microsoft is showing it off, you can bet they have patents already in place to protect the idea or bought the rights to the idea from the real innovator. Not that Apple can't find a way around that and implement first but its not a bet I'd want to make.
All in all, it sounds like something I'd want in my next smartphone. Touch control is so retro. :)
October 22, 2008 2:42 PM
"Touch control is so retro"Why not just go ahead and implant all this microtech in your brain and do away with the mechanical external hardware all together.We all know it is coming to that anyway.That way Big Brother could ping you whenever they want and control your actions that aren't specified or helpful to the majority.Maybe even plant a microcharge ( can't be harming innocent by-standers) in case your actions became too invidualistic.A simple personalized code and BANG,no more mis-behaving for you mister!!
October 23, 2008 11:34 AM
Touch was a revolutionary concept when it debuted with the iPhone, in part because it was implemented so well with gestures
Excuse me?? You should know what you are writing before you write them!! Touchscreen phones & devices have been around for quite a long time before iPhone!! Microsoft's Windows Mobile & Palm OS powered phones have been around for quite longer time, Nokia put out a touch screen tablet phone (7710) before Apple even started on iPhone!!
Know your facts guys, just don't assume that Apple invented the world!!
October 23, 2008 11:53 AM
Emit,
Nokia 7710 was around 2004 ... Nokia have part-owned Symbian since it was created, and the first Symbian touch-screen phone was the Ericsson R380 back in 2000.
Symbian basically took the Psion OS and added the phone features to it, the same way that PalmOS phones, Microsoft phones and Apple iPhone have all taken an OS and made a mobile version of it. As you say Apple is the *last* of that four to produce a touch mobile phone.
In the last few days I have been totally convinced that the next two input device improvements are going to be "proximity" touch (perhaps theramin like?) so you can wave your hands near a device ... and natural language voice input, for wristwatch phones etc. where there just isn't room for a sensible keyboard. Though there was discussion of the laser keyboard (http://www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com/) by some people at the Smartphone Show ...
October 24, 2008 3:19 AM
@The_Magician:
I didn't say Nokia was first, I know 7710 was in 2004 & I was one of the guys who used to dream of getting such a geeky gadget!! :D I just mentioned Nokia's example citing that it had pushed out a touch screen phone quite before Apple (just like some people were saying that now Nokia also imitated Apple by bringing out a touch screen phone).
October 27, 2008 4:54 AM
Touchscreen phones & devices have been around for quite a long time before iPhone!!
Yeah. Touch-screens have been around for dacades, but the "touch", and even better the "multi-touch", system in the IPhone and IPod Touch finally got away from the need for a stylus
October 28, 2008 5:39 PM
Touch screens sans stylus (stylii?) have been around for ages. The first I can remember was the HP100 and 150 series computers running on HP-DOS ver 1.0 in the 1980's. Had one; it worked very well indeed.
October 29, 2008 12:20 PM
I remember working on touch screen interfaces for medical instrumentation back in the early 80s. This is not an Apple invention, regardless of what the faithful have to say.
April 4, 2009 10:04 AM
What The hell? Why the fuck would apple watch this technology, its fucking useless and retarded. You can only use it when the device is sitting on a table, the novelty would wear off in about 10 seconds. Also its Microsoppoly why always bites things from apple, not the other way around.
October 23, 2009 8:38 AM
I was using a touch screen smart terminal connected to a honeywell mainframe back in the late 1970's.
Touch interfaces are OLD.
What MS is doing here is looking at new ways of using it, but again, this isn't new tech. A keyboardless keyboard has been available for about 2 years. It projects a keyboard diagram onto a nearby surface, and when you type, it senses where you hit the "virtual keys"...
http://www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com/