|
Monday September 22, 2008
|
Verizon Wireless's CEO, Lowell McAdam, has been talking a lot recently about openness, but it's still a surprise to see his words put into practice. Today Verizon announced that they'll let all of their customers, including new subscribers, sign up for any of their plans on a month-to-month basis. One and two year contracts will still exist, of course, and you can sign up for those if you want free or discounted phones.
That means no contracts, no termination fees, and the ability to get any Verizon Wireless plan or phone you want. On month-to-month plans, the phones are unsubsidized - they're much more expensive than phones with contract - but I think that's totally fair. (If you want a cheap phone, remember you can always pick a used one up on eBay. I've done this several times.) Existing customers must play out their existing contracts if they want to switch to this option.
T-Mobile has offered a similar service for a while, calling it "FlexPay." AT&T's product is called "GoPhone Pick Your Plan," but unlike T-Mobile and Verizon, it doesn't offer the carrier's full range of phones or plans. A Sprint customer service rep just told me they do not have any competing options.
All four carriers have recently made moves to pro-rate their early termination fees for subscribers who are stuck in contracts, but the ETFs still persist. The carriers' rationales for ETFs are generally that they're giving you a discounted phone, so you have to pay for it somehow. Verizon's new deal is honest: pay full price for the phone with no contract, or get a discounted phone and get locked in. I'm not too troubled.
I just went on Verizon's Web site, and you can tick any of their phones over to "Month-to-Month" to see what they would cost without a contract. It's definitely worth a look.
|
|
|
September 22, 2008 5:36 PM
I....don't believe it. When I read this post I really did think it was April 1 or something!
How is Verizon Wireless ready to release the stranglehold of contracts that's made them so successful up until now? I mean, I'm sure they'll recoup costs from freeer contracts on phones, but what about people whose contracts are running out, already have a phone, and just go month-to-month? They're probably not making Verizon Wireless much money anymore, are they?
Even so, this is definitely a great way for existing subscribers to eek their way out of their contracts if they're thinking about...oh, I don't know...getting an iPhone on another carrier. ;)
September 22, 2008 9:46 PM
Actually, VZW makes *more* money on the month to month customers. They charge the same amount per month that they do for the contract customers, and VZW doesn't have to pay phone subsidies. That's an additional $100 in revenue per user per year, at least.
What this is, among other things, is a powerful statement of confidence from VZW. They're saying, our network is so good that we don't need contracts to keep customers.
Also, this won't let anyone out of their contracts early. Any contract you're on still applies. This is just a new, additional option.
September 23, 2008 8:04 AM
I agree with Sascha. The m2m aren't any cheaper. I would expect them to drop $10-$20/month.