PCMag Digital Network
Seen a hot gadget?  Tell Us   
Subscribe to Gearlog Update
Our FREE email newsletter delivered to your inbox.
Email: 
Format: 
Contact Us  
Sites We Like
Categories:  

As mentioned earlier this week, the new year hasn't been especially kind to the folks at One Laptop Per Child. The last day of 2007 saw the end of their popular Give One Get One program, as well as the departure of their CTO, Mary Lou Jepsen, a key factor in the develop of the technologies that made the XO laptop a reality.

We've yet to enter the second week of 2008, and already they've been dealt another major blow, with the departure of Intel from the organization's board of directors. Of course, the departure of one of the corner stones of the tech world is nothing for a relative upstart non-profit org like OLPC, right? The organization's president, Walter Bender sure seemed to thing so. He said in an interview, "We never really got much going with Intel to have an impact."

Bender went on to call Intel's involvement in the program a, "seemingly half-hearted effort." The chip maker came on board with the organization last July, after a few public spats over the perceived threat of Intel's Classmate PC project. Both sides began work on a version of the XO which contained an Intel-created chip.

"They developed something that, as far as I know, is more expensive and more power-hungry than our current offering, so I'm not quite sure what the point is," Bender told InfoWorld. Before Intel's involvement with the organization, XO laptops had relied solely on AMD chips.

Intel ultimately ended up contributing some $100 million in the six months in which they were involved in the project. Still, Bender seemed to have trouble finding anything nice to say about the company. "The only thing they were interested in was ... helping them make marketing statements about how Intel's approach to learning was different from OLPC's approach to learning. They weren't interested in how we can learn together and make something better for kids."

| Stumble | Digg | del.icio.us | Slashdot

Posted by: alan h
January 4, 2008 4:22 PM

That sounds about right to me. Intel didn't get their way during the reseach and development phase of the process, and was likely more a partner of the project just to bolster their corporate social responsibility statment.

I think Bender's right - Intel was half-hearted and never really interested in the idea. I think what they were primarily interested in was investigating the viability of the technology so they could market their own similar products. In fact, didn't we hear word that Intel was going to release competing low-cost laptop, although more expensive and without any of those nasty socially responsible or altruistic goals?

Oh yes:
http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2006/09/intel_talks_up_.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/21/olpc_vs_intel/

Bad Intel, bad.


* = required
    Remember Me?
  
Please keep your comments on topic. Intelligent, thoughtful comments and questions are appreciated. Comments that contain personal attacks or profanity may be edited or removed. Comments containing personal information such as phone numbers, credit card numbers, or addresses may be edited or removed. Comments with advertisements will be removed.


         
    Ziff Davis Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters | RSS Feeds | Tech Shop | Tech Encyclopedia | PC Downloads | Tech Webcasts | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video | Ziff Davis Media International
1UP | AppScout | Cranky Geeks | DigitalLife | DL.TV | ExtremeTech | Filefront | GameVideos | GearLog | GoodCleanTech | My Cheats | PC Magazine | PCMagCasts | Security Watch | Smart Device Central | TechnoRide | What's New Now |
Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1996-2008 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. DigitalLife is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Media Inc. is prohibited.