Verizon Wireless marked a big change in its game plan today, by announcing plans to open up its network to "Any App, Any Device."
While company representatives insisted during a conference this morning that Verizon has long been open to innovations and shifts in the industry, users have long recognized the nation's number-two network as being one of the most restrictive--crippling features on handsets and refusing to open itself up to unlocked devices and third-party applications, while competitors such as AT&T have proven much quicker to adapt to changes in the industry.
Between the unprecedented success of the Apple iPhone and the recent announcement of the Android Open Handset Alliance (led by Google and 33 other companies including Motorola and T-Mobile, but not, for the time being, Verizon), there's been a crucial shift in the industry.
Beginning early 2008, however, Verizon will open itself to, "[a]ny device that meets the minimum technical standard," and "[a]ny application the customer chooses will be allowed on these devices." The company has yet to announce the minimal technical standards that it will set for applicable devices and applications. This is expected to be unveiled during an upcoming developers conference. A Verizon representative stated in a press conference this morning that the minimal standards are in place solely to ensure that devices will work with the network and that applications won't have adverse effects on network users, such as the spread of malware.
Asked whether the network would be open to potential hardware manufacturers beyond the major players, Verizon CTO Dick Lynch stated, "If someone has the ability to build a phone in their basement on a breadboard, and they want to bring it us, the philosophy says, 'Have at it.'"
"I think it's important for us to realize that it's not just phones that we're talking about," Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam added. He stated that the newly opened network would have the potential to cater to new devices that could potentially utilize the network, such as gaming systems. "It doesn't matter whether it sells five or 5,000 devices," added McAdam. "This makes it possible for anyone who wants to get into the game to get into the game. It just has to meet the general connectivity standards."
While the standards and test pricing have yet to be announced, McAdam added that the cost would be lower than many are anticipating. "We would expect that the provider of the device would have some fee that they would pay. I think it's going to be surprisingly reasonable. We would expect that essentially it's for services rendered."
Verizon was quick to add, however, that the opening of its network doesn't signify a shift away from the company's focus on those devices and apps created with its participation. "Verizon Wireless will continue to provide a full-service offering, from retail stores where customers can shop, to 24/7 customer service and technical support, to an easy-to-use handset interface and optimized software applications.," the company stated. "While most Verizon Wireless customers prefer the convenience of full service, the company is listening through today's announcement to a small but growing number of customers who want another choice without full service. Both full-service and 'bring-your-own' customers will have the advantage of using America's most reliable network."
"We believe that the Verizon full-service portfolio will still be pretty attractive," added McAdam during the press conference. McAdam was quick to point out that this move doesn't mean customers will be able to use unlocked iPhones on the Verizon network. "It has to be a CDMA device. The iPhone, as it exists today, would not work on the network." The CEO also shot down a suggestion that the move signals Verizon's eagerness to join with Google and the Open Handset Alliance. "I don't think it suggests that we will or won't [join]. We've talked with Google and we continue to analyze it."
He added, however, that the move will give Verizon users the ability to reap the fruits of the alliance's labor, utilizing the new OS or any other approved OS of their choice--a list that potentially includes such prominent names as Palm and Windows Mobile.
"I was pleased to hear the announcement by Verizon Wireless of its plans to introduce a new option for customers throughout the country--an option that will allow customers to use any device and to use any applications that they choose on the Verizon Wireless network," said FCC chairman Kevin Martin this morning, in a a statement issued to coincide with the announcement. "I continue to believe that more openness--at the network, device, and application level--helps foster innovation and enhances consumers' freedom and choice in purchasing wireless service."
November 27, 2007 3:15 PM
Ok, so when are they going to unlock and uncripple the buggy software in my Verizon phones? THAT'S what'll impress me! But this is a start...
November 27, 2007 5:22 PM
Well, this is definitely a good start. And we've seen before that phone manufacturers aren't particularly shy from replacing their GSM radios with CDMA radios if they think there's a market for them, and there's definitely a market when it comes to Verizon.
I think Verizon may just be tired of the rap they've gotten: "Verizon: Bringing you last year's phones tomorrow!"
Still, we'll wait and see. It could very well mean that T-Mobile's handset selection might make its way over to Verizon, assuming that their "standards" when it comes to software aren't particularly restrictive, and those of us who don't necessarily want the Verizon "full service" nonsense could bring a handset that's CDMA running something other than Verizon's software over to their network.
...okay, I doubt that'll happen. We've probably only seen Verizon open the doors to cellular manufacturers, not its customers bringing any old CDMA phone they want to a Verizon store and saying "I want to use this." Although I long for that day as well....
November 28, 2007 12:19 AM
Remember that there's also the hardware problem, that's something that Verizon can't be changing anytime soon...
November 28, 2007 6:47 AM
Customers can take a CDMA phone to Verizon Wireless and have them hook it up today. It just has to be e911 compatible which is a federal mandate not Verizon's, and you won't get the Verizon "stuff" like get it now or TV. You only get phone service.
November 28, 2007 10:49 AM
Argh - did I say T-Mobile? They're GSM, aren't they...who's the other CDMA carrier? Sprint? Sometimes I get them mixed up. :(
November 28, 2007 4:02 PM
I think this is a good start for Verizon, and a great leap for wireless phones/service in general! I use to have Verizon back before the merger when it was GTE on the west coast, and I can most definitely say that their network is probably the most reliably. However, I don't like that, unless I have a darn near grade "A" credit rating, I have to pay a ridiculous $400 deposit for a phone service that's only $50 a month. That's just preposterous! They act like they are renting me an apartment to live in for a year or something. They really need to get past this issue as well! But this article shows that they are feeling the pains from being just way too restrictive!
November 28, 2007 4:28 PM
I hope this won't open up Verizon Wireless's customers to more hackers or unwanted messages from third parties.
November 29, 2007 12:53 PM
OK, what do I do when I come from, let's say, outside the US and want to use my global (GSM) phone in Verizon's network? Well, I can't, but I can use AT&T's and T-mobile's network, because they use a global standard, and not some proprietary technology. Verizon's idea of openness: you can use any phone, as long as it uses Verizon's technology!
January 2, 2008 10:54 AM
CDMA is not a Verizon proprietary technology. I'm not a Verizon advocate or anything but you should check your facts on communications protocols before you post such things. AT&T used to use CDMA before they moved over to their current GSM network. I was actually a customer during that transition and switched networks and found the GSM network not nearly as good as the CDMA one. A friend of mine in the buisiness told me the GSM network is not as good a technology but it is cheaper to implement and run.