I have yet to delve too deeply into the actual exercise functions of this thing--while I did wear it during my work out, last night, my routine generally consists of a two-mile run on the treadmill, and thus most of the actual workout features were rendered a bit moot--I will, however echo the call for a heart rate monitor on this bad boy.
In terms of actual exercise features, I'd be loath to recommend the i-Control over the fuller-featured Nike + iPod Sport Kit, which features better iPod integration, a pedometer, and clocks in at a fraction of the $125 price. However, whereas the Nike kit only works with the nano, the Ironman can also connect to standard 5G iPods (and iPhones in airplane mode), via a wireless dongle that connects to the port of the bottom of the player. Of course, Apple doesn't really recommend running around with a 5G on your person, due to the potential skippage, thanks to movable parts inside.
The iPod controls themselves aren't really enough reason to justify the purchase of the Ironman--save for the initial novelty of being able to control your iPod from watch (and, naturally, showing said fact off to everyone you bump into on the street)--there's no real benefit of having controls on your wrist, rather than, say, on your ear, via a pair of Bluetooth headphones, which afford you the added luxury of being able to toss the device in your backpack. Until Timex introduces a watch with a display on it, and controls that go beyond Pause/Play, volume, and track forward/back, the Ironman's iPod capabilities are rather limited.
I will say this: I underestimated the handiness of being able to control my iPod's volume from the watch. It's a convenient feature, when entering different environments, like, say, getting out of a subway station, or getting on an elevator. Play/Pause is cool too, but it's a bit of a shame that you can't actually turn the iPod off, by holding down the button. I utilized the track skip button a bit, but without fast-forward/rewind features and menu/track display capabilities, my fickle music-listening tendencies still had me pulling my iPod out my pocket fairly often.
The buttons take a bit of getting used to--save for Play/Pause, the buttons are standard watch-size, and often take a few presses to trigger, when familiarizing yourself with device. The Play/Pause and Track Back buttons also have workout features attached to them, so from time to time, I found myself triggering laps, when all I want to do was hear a song again.
Perhaps I'm being a bit too hard on the device. In terms of workout features and as a standard watch, the Ironman delivers just fine--when it comes to iPod integration, however, while certain features were handy, it's hard not to view the overall package as something of a missed opportunity.
August 3, 2007 1:11 PM
I think the i-control is a bit goofy, but your comparison to the Nike kit seems a bit off the mark. These really aren't competing products - the Timex controls your iPod but doesn't give you workout information, while the Nike kit tracks workout data but doesn't control your iPod. Also, the price data is a bit misleading. To use the Nike kit, don't you also need Nike+ shoes? The starting MSRP on those is $85, so the kit would run you $114. Maybe they could combine them all into the Apple Nikemex Super Workout Kit, with Nike+ shoes, the Nike transmitter and receiver, a Timex i-control watch with heartrate sensor and a chest strap.
August 13, 2007 11:14 AM
As a runner, I'm seeing plenty of flaws in your writeup. First off, as a marathoner, I can tell you that a Timex Ironman stopwatch with 50 lap memory, 2 interval settings etc, is the #1 watch you see on runners.
You're talking about getting in and out of subways, instead of being out there running 7 miles with it.
Why don't you lend the thing to someone who does run, who will use both the iPod features as well as test out the inter-operability of also doing lap splits, or Mile splits etc...
I personally am quite intrigued with the idea of not having to reach over to my arm and feel my way around the nano to switch the song or decrease/increase the volume, and instead control those features on my watch. As a runner, you don't look for the display, you just want to move to a new song.
June 3, 2008 11:06 AM
Very well put marathon man! I also want to add that sweating is part of running. So those of you who want sweat all over your Gucci or Fossil go ahead. Overall I see it as a luxury to runners, sorry cubicle man it doesn't look good in your suit as you expose your wrist drinking coffee.
November 29, 2008 1:54 AM
This review is actually quite a relevant comparison, as the Nike+ dongle works with Nike's Amp+Remote watch.