PCMag Digital Network
Seen a hot gadget?  Tell Us   
Subscribe to Gearlog Update
Our FREE email newsletter delivered to your inbox.
Email: 
Format: 
Contact Us  
Sites We Like
Categories:  
smog.jpg

Are you choking on toner fumes? A study by the Queensland Institute of Technology is receiving a great deal of attention today, as researchers found that in concentrated environments, laserjet dust could equal the levels of particulates found in homes of people who smoke. (Edit: Printer analyst David Stone points out that the smog could be toner, paper dust, or a combination of the two.)

This should be of concern to most of you, as studies have found that internal air quality can be worse than outdoors. It's one reason that smoking has been banned indoors and restaurants -- without proper ventilation, there really is a "no smoking" area.

However, while the study is sophisticated, it's really just a jumping-off point for further research.



The study originally was designed to look at the efficacy of an office building's HVAC (cooling) system. The study's authors then looked at which office equipment were causing the most particulates, and identified the 62 laser printers as the chief culprits of the smog.

Here's where the study breaks down somewhat. Of the 62 printers, 42 printers were different models. And, of those, 34 were manufactured by HP. So, statistically, the HP printers should have a greater statistical likelihood of being identified as high emitters of airborne particles, and they were. Now, is it fair to characterize HP as a manufacturer of toner-spewing printers? Without more comprehensive testing, I think it's fair to simply note the correlation, without drawing conclusions -- as the researchers did.

On the other hand, I find it hard to believe that HP, as the world's largest printer manufacturer, wouldn't have it own research to add to the pot. So far, HP hasn't responded to my requests for that information, which is a tad suspicious.

One other note: the "cigarette" comparisons you're seeing in this post and elsewhere came from a test of the printer inside a one-meter-wide glass testing area. So if you've got a cubicle next to the printer shack, move. And let's hope that we see more research in this area. I suspect we will.

| Stumble | Digg | del.icio.us | Slashdot
* = required
    Remember Me?
  
Please keep your comments on topic. Intelligent, thoughtful comments and questions are appreciated. Comments that contain personal attacks or profanity may be edited or removed. Comments containing personal information such as phone numbers, credit card numbers, or addresses may be edited or removed. Comments with advertisements will be removed.


         
    Ziff Davis Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters | RSS Feeds | Tech Shop | Tech Encyclopedia | PC Downloads | Tech Webcasts | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video | Ziff Davis Media International
1UP | AppScout | Cranky Geeks | DigitalLife | DL.TV | ExtremeTech | Filefront | GameVideos | GearLog | GoodCleanTech | My Cheats | PC Magazine | PCMagCasts | Security Watch | Smart Device Central | TechnoRide | What's New Now |
Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Copyright © 1996-2008 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. DigitalLife is a registered trademark of Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Media Inc. is prohibited.