|
Tuesday May 8, 2007
|
The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project, in which researchers have designed a laptop that costs approximately $100 and can be distributed to underprivileged children around the world, apparently has nothing on the Indian government. Its human resources department has launched a project to bring the cost of such a laptop down by a factor of ten, to $10 per laptop, per child.
The people behind the OLPC project had a hard enough time getting all of the necessary technologies packed into a small and rugged machine that can be used around the globe in any condition with or without line power for $100, so it'll be impressive to see what India comes up with. Almost certainly, the Indian government will axe features like the OLPC's hand-crank power and wifi/mesh-networking equipment in order to bring costs down, but whether or not the $10 laptop will actually be usable in the end remains to be seen. If it turns out to be a $10 speak-n-spell, it won't be much use in bridging the digital divide.
Even so, people were similarly skeptical about the OLPC when it was announced. When the first PCs started rolling off the assembly lines, running Linux and sporting all of the features that were promised for just a little over $100 each, people cheered. The Indian government claims to be finalizing two designs for the $10 laptop, and even if it's unsuccessful, it claims to have found a way to make the $100 laptop only $47 to produce. Either way, this could make it even more affordable to reach out and help underprivileged and uneducated children (and people of all ages) around the world. [ via NewLaunches ]
Post by Alan Henry
Posted By:
Gearlog
|
|
|
May 8, 2007 3:14 PM
I don't understand this cheap-tech craze. People in India that can't afford full-fledged computers tend to need FOOD and SHELTER, not cheap computers.
May 9, 2007 10:36 PM
Not really, cheap laptops would help them in the long run; BTW $10 can't put and end to poverty & malnutrition there.
July 7, 2007 10:34 AM
I wonder if the previous posters live or have worked in a developing country. While my work is mostly in agricultural development (read: the boonies of developing countries) i am a tech nut. I have stopped counting all the times poor people (less than $2 per day) have told me "I don't want a seminar about how to better use fertilizer" Or "this womens right stuff is useless, what my family needs is a TV". Comments like those used to make me cringe (still do actually) but i have come to the conclusion that is is difficult to *make* people accept aid that *you* think is best for them. Chances are they (or more likely thier children) could really make use of an OLPC, that might not be what they need the most but it is what they are more willing to accept. So, is some aid better than no aid, in many cases yes, especially if the acceptance rate is high. -Gaiko
March 10, 2009 7:14 AM
Well price should not be the issue. The Quality is important. Yes we indian people are very intelligent.
I personally feel that our Quality should be match to MICROSOFT - Bill Gitt