PCMag Digital Network
Seen a hot gadget?  Tell Us   
Subscribe to Gearlog Update
Our FREE email newsletter delivered to your inbox.
Email: 
Format: 
Contact Us  
Sites We Like
Categories:  
UltimateGameRoom.jpg

A while back, my friend and colleague Sascha Segan waxed rhapsodic about buying his one-year-old daughter a laptop. He says that we should raise kids to be media-fluent and that there's nothing wrong with screen time for even the youngest children. While I agree that we need to raise media-literate children who become discriminating viewers, technology users, and consumers, I think he fundamentally misjudges the cultural environment we're in. It's not as if this country is plagued by a rash of parents trashing their TVs and computers and raising their children in an Amish-style media vacuum. Quite the opposite: This is a nation of TV junkies and technology fanatics.

In most households, the TV is on for about seven hours a day. By the time the average kid graduates from high school, they will have spent 11,000 hours in school--and more than 15,000 hours watching TV. Kids under six-years of age already spend more time watching TV and playing video games then they do reading. Now, I love playing video games, but I'm kind of partial to reading, too.

I realize I'm tipping two sacred cows here. I'm discussing the negative effects of technology to tech fans on a technology blog, and I'm telling parents how to raise their kids. But I don't really care. The problems are too big to ignore. Childhood obesity, rampant consumerism, and even ADHD have been directly linked to excessive screen time. And the research that documents the negative effects of children viewing televised violence is nothing short of overwhelming.



Sascha derides the American Academy of Pediatrics for recommending children under the age of two get no screen time. Is this an outlandish recommendation? The first two years of life are critical for brain development. The University of Washington Department of Pediatrics has shown a correlation between the number of hours of television watched before age 3 and ADHD-related symptoms at age 7. If my doctor thinks that TV will get in the way of my child's ability to develop cognitively, physically, socially, and emotionally, I'm not going to dismiss it.

Maybe part of the reason Sascha and I see this differently is that we have different kids. He has an angelic one-year-old girl with nothing but possibilities before her. I have an 12-year old stepson with a MySpace page loaded with Family Guy clips who's already beaten Gears of War. And we don't even own that game. He beat it a friend's house. I've seen the future. And it isn't pretty.

Clearly, I haven't banned technology from our house, but limits are essential. Emmet can't watch TV or play video games until his homework is done. That's pretty straightforward, right? Well, he's found more than a few loopholes. How about the PC? Word, yes. MySpace, no. What about watching videos on the iPod? No, that counts as watching TV. PSP? Forget about it. He's allowed to listen to music on his PC, but the screen has to be off. Otherwise, homework time quickly becomes another shopping trip on iTunes.

Can't I blame him? Turns out, playing video games activates the basal ganglia portion of the brain, the region that releases dopamine. This is the same region of the brain that's affected by cocaine. Problem is, that release means there is less dopamine available when the child needs to perform other, less enjoyable tasks, like homework. Videos games are not like cocaine, your brain thinks they are cocaine. And if you doubt that try to take the controller out of Emmet's hands before he reaches a save point.

Bill Gates restricts his 10-year-old daughter's screen time to 45 minutes during the week and hour and a half on weekends. Granted, she goes to a school where the kids use tablet PCs every day, but still, he doing this for a reason. The limit is clearly more important than the potential gain. Not coincidentally, I am sure, Windows Vista lets you set application and Internet access for your kids from a central control panel.

Put simply, you can't rely on kids to limit their media intake. Media literacy requires more than having an off switch on the TV. It requires parents with the knowledge and will to press it. It means not just knowing what your kids are watching, but what games they're playing and what lessons are being learned. Sascha knows this, of course. But there are huge swaths of this country that don't.

Kids will master the technology on their own, far faster than their parents in most cases. As Emmet proudly told me the other day "I know how to erase my browser history, Dan, just so you know." Fortunately, he still thinks cookies are for dessert.

(BTW, I pulled the image above from an old issue of PC Magazine in which I used Emmet as a model for the "Ultimate Game Room." So I admit some complicity in his current game and TV addiction.)
| Stumble | Digg | del.icio.us | Slashdot
Posted by: Thomas
March 8, 2007 11:39 PM

I couldn't agree more.

Now try establishing those limits with a split household where there are no limits in one house and strict limits in another.

My son is ADHD and it's hard to get any of the kids, especally him, to participate in any activity that doesn't involve or lead to something in front of a screen.

My parents say I'm getting payment for what I did to them. :)

http://www.thomaswimprine.com/blog


Posted by: Bob
March 9, 2007 9:29 AM

I fully agree.

My doctor told us the same thing about not tv time until at least 2. So, at age 3 1/2, she has seen only 4 movies. I don't think it has hurt her. She has the same knowledge of Disney stories, only she has them in book form.

And I think this is the perfect forum for this article. As tech people, it is only natural for us to want our kids to be technology-oriented also, but we have to take our time with it and let the kids enjoy being children.


Posted by: Otis
March 9, 2007 12:38 PM

u hit the nail on the head.

when i was 12 (i'm 23 now) i got a super nes for christmas... if i wasn't told only 2 hours a day. i would have lived on that thing... (2 hour sounds long now, but back then it wasn't) i now know that was the right idea... thats what i plan on doing with my kids.. (but first a wife would be nice)

good read


Posted by: phoenix
March 9, 2007 2:47 PM

This doesn't speak to the point of your article at all, but I LOVED that "Build It" segment in that particular PCMag. I still have it, and will one day create my ultimate gaming den using that as a guide. :D


Posted by: Dan Costa
March 13, 2007 7:23 PM

That was a good build it. I wish we didn't have to take it down.


Posted by: Reynaldo
March 14, 2007 4:58 PM

The real problem comes about when a supposedly professional journalist can't even write a one paragraph intro to an article with out grammer and spelling errors.Maybe I kan got me uh poof reeding job at ur magezeen?


Posted by: phoenix
March 17, 2007 2:02 AM

::sigh:: Honestly, I love the folks who can't speak to the content of the article, so they nitpick at spelling and grammar. I hope it makes them feel superior, because they look like idiots.


* = required
    Remember Me?
  
Please keep your comments on topic. Intelligent, thoughtful comments and questions are appreciated. Comments that contain personal attacks or profanity may be edited or removed. Comments containing personal information such as phone numbers, credit card numbers, or addresses may be edited or removed. Comments with advertisements will be removed.


 
Lenovo ThinkPad T400
Lenovo ThinkPad W700
Click Here Click Here
         
    Ziff Davis Home | Contact Us | Advertise | Link to Us | Reprints | Magazine Subscriptions | Newsletters | RSS Feeds | Tech Shop | Tech Encyclopedia | PC Downloads | Tech Webcasts | Tech Podcasts | Tech Video | Ziff Davis Media International
AppScout | Cranky Geeks | DigitalLife | DL.TV | ExtremeTech | Filefront | GearLog | GoodCleanTech | PC Magazine | PCMagCasts | Security Watch | Smart Device Central | What's New Now |
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Linking Policy | Contact Us |
Copyright © 1996-2009 Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. All Rights Reserved. PC Magazine, the PCMag.com logo and Gearlog are registered trademarks of Ziff Davis Publishing Holdings Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Ziff Davis Media Inc. is prohibited.